Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Toxicol Pathol ; 47(6): 665-783, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31526133

RESUMO

The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP), and North America (STP) to develop an internationally accepted nomenclature for proliferative and nonproliferative changes in rats and mice. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for classifying changes observed in the hematolymphoid organs, including the bone marrow, thymus, spleen, lymph nodes, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues, and other lymphoid tissues (serosa-associated lymphoid clusters and tertiary lymphoid structures) with color photomicrographs illustrating examples of the lesions. Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous lesions as well as lesions induced by exposure to test materials. The nomenclature for these organs is divided into 3 terminologies: descriptive, conventional, and enhanced. Three terms are listed for each diagnosis. The rationale for this approach and guidance for its application to toxicologic pathology are described in detail below.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Doenças da Medula Óssea/classificação , Medula Óssea , Doenças Linfáticas/classificação , Tecido Linfoide , Animais , Animais de Laboratório , Medula Óssea/anatomia & histologia , Medula Óssea/patologia , Doenças da Medula Óssea/sangue , Doenças da Medula Óssea/imunologia , Doenças da Medula Óssea/patologia , Doenças Linfáticas/sangue , Doenças Linfáticas/imunologia , Doenças Linfáticas/patologia , Tecido Linfoide/anatomia & histologia , Tecido Linfoide/patologia , Camundongos , Ratos , Terminologia como Assunto
2.
Toxicol Pathol ; 44(2): 173-88, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26879688

RESUMO

Historically, there has been confusion relating to the diagnostic nomenclature for individual cell death. Toxicologic pathologists have generally used the terms "single cell necrosis" and "apoptosis" interchangeably. Increased research on the mechanisms of cell death in recent years has led to the understanding that apoptosis and necrosis involve different cellular pathways and that these differences can have important implications when considering overall mechanisms of toxicity, and, for these reasons, the separate terms of apoptosis and necrosis should be used whenever differentiation is possible. However, it is also recognized that differentiation of the precise pathway of cell death may not be important, necessary, or possible in routine toxicity studies and so a more general term to indicate cell death is warranted in these situations. Morphological distinction between these two forms of cell death can sometimes be straightforward but can also be challenging. This article provides a brief discussion of the cellular mechanisms and morphological features of apoptosis and necrosis as well as guidance on when the pathologist should use these terms. It provides recommended nomenclature along with diagnostic criteria (in hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]-stained sections) for the most common forms of cell death (apoptosis and necrosis). This document is intended to serve as current guidance for the nomenclature of cell death for the International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria Organ Working Groups and the toxicologic pathology community at large. The specific recommendations are:Use necrosis and apoptosis as separate diagnostic terms.Use modifiers to denote the distribution of necrosis (e.g., necrosis, single cell; necrosis, focal; necrosis, diffuse; etc.).Use the combined term apoptosis/single cell necrosis whenThere is no requirement or need to split the processes, orWhen the nature of cell death cannot be determined with certainty, orWhen both processes are present together. The diagnosis should be based primarily on the morphological features in H&E-stained sections. When needed, additional, special techniques to identify and characterize apoptosis can also be used.


Assuntos
Apoptose , Necrose , Patologia/normas , Terminologia como Assunto , Toxicologia/normas , Animais , Masculino , Camundongos , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
3.
Toxicol Pathol ; 34(5): 409-24, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17067937

RESUMO

Lymph nodes are traditionally regarded as having three compartments, the cortex, paracortex and medulla. B and T cells home to separate areas within these compartments, interact with antigen presenting cells, and undergo clonal expansion. This paper provides structural and functional details about how the lymph node brings lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells together. The concept of the lymphoid lobule as the basic functional and anatomic unit of the lymph node is developed and utilized to provide a framework for understanding lymph node pathobiology. Understanding the histomorphologic features of the lymphoid lobule and the role of the reticular meshwork scaffolding of the lymph node and how these related to the cortex, paracortex and medulla provides a unique approach to understanding lymph node structure and function.


Assuntos
Linfonodos/anatomia & histologia , Linfonodos/fisiologia , Animais , Células Dendríticas/citologia , Células Dendríticas/imunologia , Linfócitos/citologia , Linfócitos/imunologia , Camundongos , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA